History, 17.12.2020 01:00, bella122805
HEL
I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)
Historical “revisionism” is the practice of revising the generally accepted version of a history. Rather than assuming that history books and previous historians are “telling the whole truth” about history, revisionists reexamine the evidence left by history and may assign new and different meaning or significance to historical events.
Reasonable people disagree about whether historical revisionism is a valid and beneficial practice. What do you think? Should people accept the version of history that they’ve been taught, or should they look for other ways to interpret, view, or describe historical events?
Explain your answer in a thoughtful discussion post, including your reasons for thinking as you do about revisionism.
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, anthonybowie99
Explain how john f. kennedy organized the content of his speech. cite specific examples from his speech to support your answer
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, fjjjjczar8890
Which is proper hierarchy or leadership roles in the senate from lowest to highest
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, dinero2875
Define”to walk with a large group of people who are supporting something”
Answers: 2
HEL
I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)
Historical “revisionism...
Historical “revisionism...
History, 01.03.2021 14:00
Biology, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
History, 01.03.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00