History
History, 12.12.2020 16:20, srtero

HELP PLEASEEE In the Scott v. Sandford case, Scott's argument was based on O the Missouri Compromise.
O the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
O the Fugitive Slave Act.
O the Fourteenth Amendment.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 07:50, ashleypere99
Read the passage below. which of these statements describes the problem with including this passage as part of an explanatory essay? passage: the neolithic revolution changed everything for humans. before the n. r., you couldn't even plant food. i know you want to hear more, don't even deny it! o a. the tone is too dull and does not include a hook to keep the reader interested. o b. the tone is too objective and does not show the author's opinion. o c. the tone is too transitional and does not stay focused on one topic. o d. the tone is too informal and does not use appropriate vocabulary. surmit
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:30, DaiDai8328
What was one possible outcome of their virginia and kentucky resolves
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:40, ayoismeisalex
What was used by federalists to ratify the constitution?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 13:00, innocentman69
Do you think the isolationist were correct in arguing the roosevelt’s policies, including lend lease, would increase the likelihood of war
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
HELP PLEASEEE In the Scott v. Sandford case, Scott's argument was based on O the Missouri Compromis...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 26.11.2020 04:50
Konu
World Languages, 26.11.2020 04:50