20. What was one reason that colonizers preferred to enslave Africans to work in the colonies? O A. African people knew how to cultivate rice and grow other crops.
O B. It was expensive to transport Native Americans by land.
O C. Indentured servants from Europe frequently rebelled and went back to their homelands.
D. African people were more likely to accept their enslaved status and were less rebellious.

The correct answer is option A "African people knew how to cultivate rice and grow other crops."

Explanation:

The European interest for New World money crops, particularly sugar, tobacco, rice, and cotton, prompted an interest for labor to develop these yields. In spite of the fact that the acts of contracted bondage and the oppression of Native Americans was at that point set up, grower in the southern English provinces immediately came to support subjugated Africans. In addition to the fact that africans were suited to heat and humidities, they additionally brought exceptional abilities and farming information for harvests, for example, rice, which the English discovered helpful. Bondage and the African slave exchange immediately turned into a structure square of the provincial economy and a vital piece of growing and building up the English business domain in the Atlantic world.

In the North American states, the importation of African slaves was coordinated principally toward the south, where broad tobacco, rice, and later, cotton estate economies, requested broad work forces for development.

citizens united v. federal election commission, case in which the u.s. supreme court on january 21, 2010, ruled (5–4) that laws that prevented corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds for independent “electioneering communications” (political advertising) violated the first amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. in so doing the court invalidated section 203 of the federal bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra)—also known as the mccain-feingold act for its sponsors, sen. john mccain and sen. russ feingold—as well as section 441(b) of the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), which the bcra had amended. the court also overturned in whole or in part two previous supreme court rulings: austin v. michigan chamber of commerce (1990) and mcconnell v. federal election commission (2003).

immediately perceived as historically important, the decision generated intense controversy outside the court. some hailed it as a resounding victory for freedom of speech, while others criticized it as an overreaching attempt to rewrite campaign finance law. among the critics was pres. barack obama, who remarked in his state of the union address in the house of representatives one week later that the decision would “open the floodgates for special interests…to spend without limit in our elections.” his criticism provoked one of the supreme court justices in attendance, samuel a. alito, to break decorum by mouthing the words “not true.”

explanation:

is this a multiple choice question? if so, could i see the answers to give you the right one!