Someone fix this please (its not mine but I need it to be fixed like grammar wise) The United States shouldn't have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the regionhad also Native American nations, an alternative buy be to buy or get agreements to explore the regions. A second reason is that it is a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an atittude which many countries do not accept. Counterargument: It was their right to keep their state and not invade and declare war because of land.

Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the weath.

The United States should not have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the region had many Native American nations, an alternative solution would be to buy create agreements to explore the regions. Another reason is that a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an attitude which many countries do not accept.

Counterargument: It was the Native American's right to keep their land and not invade and declare war because of land.

Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the wealth

false

explanation:

workers of lowell mills were greatly benefited for the waltham type of work which was more a paternalist kind, trying to protect the integrity of this little girls coming from small farmers and providing an adequate place of work, this in an effort to avoid the issues of bad place conditions and immorality that the people in bigger industrialized cities of great britain were experimenting.