100 POINTS AFTER YOU ANSWER How was the Mongol invader, Babur, different from Ibrahim and the previous sultans of Delhi?

1.Babur convinced his rival Muslim sultans that they should share responsibility for India's conversion to Islam.

2.Babur was willing to attack another Muslim ruler, and he was more tolerant of Hinduism than the previous sultans.

3.Babur was much more brutal in his attempts to rule Indian and to convert its Hindus to Islam.

4.Babur invaded India to gain riches for himself as well as converts to Islam.

Hiya!

Babur was willing to attack another Muslim ruler, and he was more tolerant of Hinduism than the previous sultans.

Hope this helped

Explanation:

Babur was willing to attack another Muslim ruler, and he was more tolerant of Hinduism than the previous sultans.

Explanation:

I took the test :)

in griswold v. connecticut (1965), the supreme court ruled that a state's ban on the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.