A bar graph of deaths of soldiers by country in World War One. The x-axis is labeled country with countries Russia, British Empire, France, United States, Japan, Romania, Serbia, Belgium, Greece, Portugal, Montenegro, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and Bulgaria. The y-axis is labeled Deaths by Country from 1 to 10,000,000. Russia, British Empire, France, Germany, and Austria-Hungary have 1,000,000 deaths or more. All countries except Japan are over 10,000 deaths. Which conclusion can be drawn from the data?

The nations involved in World War I suffered major losses of life.
The Triple Alliance countries suffered relatively fewer casualties in the war.
The Triple Entente countries suffered relatively fewer casualties in the war.
The US lost more soldiers than most European nations involved in the war. (SOMEONE HELP)

the best description of postwar writers might be progressive.

following the war, writers showed a tendency to work on artistic or social matters rather than political themes. while postwar literature may not have been the greatest period of english literature, the themes provided excellent critics a high number of novels. such examples include anthony burgess, anthony powell and frank kermode, all of which can be placed under the progressive view.

i think that the answer is polishing peanuts

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is