History
History, 02.12.2020 21:30, zahid79

Because in secession I see no remedy for the actual and present evils complained of, and because the prospective evils depicted so gloomily may never come; and if they should, the inalienable right to resist tyranny and oppression might then be exercised as well and as successfully as now. - "A Protest against the Ordinance of Secession, James G. Taliaferro What "prospective evils" is Taliaferro referring to? Check all that apply.

Lincoln might bring an end to slavery and injure the economy.

The federal government might interfere more in state issues.

Lincoln might persecute Southern leaders who oppose him.

Southerners' voices might not be heard by the federal government.

Federal tariffs will likely be eliminated.

Politicians from the South might be replaced by Northern politicians.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:30, asdf2342
What best explains why the us government placed restrictions on asian immigration through angel island? many americans did not believe in assimilation. many americans did not approve of the gentleman’s agreement. many americans held nativist or racist views. many americans feared a loss of educational opportunities.
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:00, ekids22
Review the territory. all land from the bighorn mountains down to south dakota territory. what happened to this territory as a result of the treaty of fort laramie in 1868? it was confiscated by the us government, as a consequence for the battle of the little bighorn. it was given to the us government by the lakota sioux, who got reservation lands in exchange. it was gifted by the us government to the lakota sioux, who viewed it as a sacred place. it was allocated for lakota sioux to settle, but the us government maintained mining rights.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, vshelton6549
What did alexander hamilton and john adams lead
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, aladuke79
Read the following passage. the early mill girls were of different ages. some were not over ten years old; a few were in middle life, but the majority were between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five. the very young girls were called "doffers." they "doffed," or took off, the full bobbins from the spinning frames, and replaced them with empty ones. based on the passage, early mill girls were mostly young. were mostly middle aged. were of a variety of ages. were mostly children.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Because in secession I see no remedy for the actual and present evils complained of, and because the...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.01.2021 03:50