Explain why a president might make an executive agreement rather than negotiate a formal treaty. in your answer, include one advantage and one disadvantage of an executive agreement.

An executive agreement does not require a 2/3 vote by the Senate and therefore without Congressional approval an agreement can be reached more quickly.

An advantage of an executive agreement is a quicker process for reaching an agreement with a foreign power. In a situation where violence could or is occurring, an executive agreement could be necessary to resolve the situation.

A disadvantage is a lack of Congressional support. A treaty needs a 2/3 Senate approval showing the people and another branch of the government are supporting an agreement with a foreign country. If Congress does not get a chance to support the agreement, it may be difficult to create laws or provide money to the agreement when it goes into effect.

roosevelt believed that in light of the country's recent military successes, it was unnecessary to use force to achieve foreign policy goals, so long as the military could threaten force. this belief, and his strategy of “speaking softly and carrying a big stick,” shaped much of roosevelt's foreign policy.

the answer is option b.

explanation:

they could veto laws. this announcement does not portray the individuals from the roman senate since the praetor urban was the one that could veto laws. the power or right vested in one part of an administration to drop or put off the choices, institutions, and so on., of another branch, particularly the privilege of a president, representative, or other ceo to dismiss bills gone by the lawmaking body.