Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 17:50, Derrionna
Ahistorian is writing a book about british prime minister winston churchill. she claims that churchill was one of the earliest british leaders to realize that nazi germany was a serious threat to british security what is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid? o a. review primary sources to see if churchill ever recorded his opinions of nazi germany. o b. find out whether the historian has written any other books about british leaders. c. analyze secondary sources summarizing the effects of nazi germany on great britain. o d. cite the historian's book in another study about important 20th- century world leaders.
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 19:10, joebossmc2184
Historians are concerned with the accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of the inability of authors to know every angle of every story biases, perspectives, beliefs, and a variety of other differences history being told by one person at a time no one being totally accurate, as hard as we try really need on this, and you^^
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 22:00, leleee10
Which of the following led to a continuation of the treatment in the excerpt above? a)the brutality of the trans-atlantic african slave trade. b)spanish repression after violent native uprisings in new spain during the 16th century. c)european competition to quickly establish colonial holdings in the new world. d)the reliance of the spanish on native americans to provide labor under the encomienda system.
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 02:10, jonathanmenosky11
The louisianna purchase was controversil because
Answers: 1
What did christopher columbus accomplish?...
Chemistry, 01.12.2020 17:40
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 17:40
Business, 01.12.2020 17:40
Social Studies, 01.12.2020 17:40
English, 01.12.2020 17:40
Biology, 01.12.2020 17:40