Why would a historian wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic? A) to confirm his or her own biases about a subject B) To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event C) To identify a research question to pursue D) To question his or her beliefs about an event

The correct answer is B) To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event.

Why would a historian wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event.

This is a very important aspect of the historian's job. He/she is looking for valid information in ist research. Historians need to corroborate that the information they are going to write about and share, is true. Historians have credibility and a reputation to maintain, and they won't dare to risk this reputation writing something that is not true or biased.

That is why they must double-check their sources before sharing their reports.

4 copper and gold, the california gold rush is why im pretty sure.

an interest group is an organization whose members share common concerns, and try to influence government policies that impact those concerns. elected officials frequently complain about the influence of "special interests" on american politics.