History
History, 20.11.2020 18:00, jbainbynn1296

Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blog posts can never be used as secondary sources, even if written by credible authors or posted on acceptable websites such as .gov or .org websites. No, blog posts should not be used as secondary sources because it is difficult to establish the credibility of the authors as they are often biased and do not always use facts. Yes, blog posts can always be used because they are either a primary or secondary source, and credibility concerns are secondary to the type of source. Yes, even if this information is biased, blog posts can be used as primary sources if balanced by facts, reasoned judgments, and analysis by more credible sources.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, msdmdsm7925
The north was victorious in the battle of bull run true or false
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:40, emmaishere69
What were some effects of the viet cong uprising
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, cjdolce9790
In the latter stages of the civil war who was given the responsibility of winning the war for the north
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:20, jako12
What is the main problem with the commission form of government? a commissioners often focus on one area. b. each commissioner has too much administrative power. c. the commissioners have trouble working together. d. commissioners are often very corrupt.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 22.08.2019 08:00