Does Brutus make a strong case for the momentousness of the choice facing Americans? For example, is the appeal to the wisdom of Montesquieu and the

experience of history persuasive? With which powers of the new government is

Brutus here especially concerned? Why does Brutus believe that a republic as

large as the one proposed by the Constitution will lead to tyranny?

1. Brutus makes an important point about the relevance of the option that Americans must make since it exposes weaknesses in democracy and displays anxiety for the government's economic honesty.  Brutus brings up the question of whether democracy is a feasible solution in the country.

2. Brutus' appeal is persuasive because it makes use of his power and alludes to Montesquieu, a well-known name in the laws and administration of egalitarian and advantageous governmental systems.

3.  Brutus is concerned about the federal government's consolidated influence in the country. He believes that this will lead to abuses of power and leave the country in the hands of a totalitarian and dictatorial government, similar to the one from which the country fought to be free.

4.  A country made up of tiny independent and equal republics is preferable since such a huge republic wields unique power, rendering the entire country submissive and devoid of autonomy.

To know more about the answer of the parts of the context, refer to the link below:

link

Answer and Explanation:

1. Brutus has a strong point about the importance of the choice that Americans face, because it points out negative points in democracy and shows a concern with the integrity of the country's policy. With that, Brutus points out whether democracy is a considerable system to implement in the country.

2. The appeal that Brutus presents is convincing, because it uses the influence he has and alludes to Montesquieu, which is a strong name within the politics and organization of egalitarian and beneficial political systems.

3. Brutus is concerned about the central power that the federal government has throughout the country. he believes that this can cause abuses of power and leave the country in a totalitarian and tyrannical government in the same way as the government to which the country struggled to free itself was.

4. Because such a large republic has a unique power, leaving the whole country submissive and without autonomy, being better, a country formed by small autonomous and egalitarian republics.

it refers to race, i am pretty sure this was a popular term in nazi germany or something.