History, 17.11.2020 04:40, angeline310

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?
A separate bill of rights might be used later to weaken America’s reputation.
A separate bill of rights be might used later to free enslaved people.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution was not taking away any rights from citizens.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 22:10, maxy7347go

All of the following are true of humanism during the renaissance except a. it was a new way of looking at the world c. it focused on religion b. it caused ancient roman and greek texts to become popular d. it dealt with emotion

Answers: 3

continue

History, 21.06.2019 22:30, cheyennebrooke01

What impact did the gi bill and the interstate highway act of 1957 have on the development of the suburbs

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:00, casting479

Which side was right? write a paragraph in which you explain which side made a stronger argument and why. remember to use evidence from the lesson and from primary source documents you have read.

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:30, cielo2761

Ok serious americans were british ay don’t we have a british accent?

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?