What does Hamilton mean by "the permanent tenure of judicial offices"? Does Hamilton support or oppose this idea? HELP!

Explanation:

I may not be right but I think he means that permanent tenure recognizes the complexities of the law in a free society and nothing would contribute enough as much as a strong argument. And a few people would have enough knowledge and integrity to judge the law and should be retained because they are adequate to the office, so I think Hamilton supports it but I’m not entirely sure.

whose power in the senate is equal to the power of the speaker of the house?

with my recent question