The trends in military personnel and state revenue shown in the table are best understood in the context of which of the following changes in the relationship between states and local elites in the period 1450–1750 ?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You did not include the table for reference either the options for this question. Without the table, we do not know what you are referring to. However, we can say the following.

The trends in military personnel and state revenue shown in the table are best understood in the context of the following changes in the relationship between states and local elites in the period 1450–1750.

The context is that the authority of the states was continually centralized at the expense of the most prominent elites of each state.

This meant that powerful elites and wealthy families established a certain kind of dominion and control over other social classes that could not do much to overcome their situation.

The presence of these elites was a sign of inequity that harmed people and prolonged the separation between the ones who had more and the ones that did not have enough.

part a. there were 250 teenagers surveyed (100% of tenagers = 250)therefore 1 % = 250/100 = 2.5 76% = 1% x 76 = 2.5 x 76 = 190 teenagers of the 250 surveyed liked burgerspart b: jane surveyed 25% (which is equal to 50 teenagers, i.e. a quarter of the teenagers surveyed is 50) to get 100% we simply get 4 quarters, i.e. multiply 50 by 4 = 200 teenagers were surveyed by jane. part c: it is impossible to give an example where a percentage is greater than 100%, since, by definition , percentage means "per 100".

answer: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

explanation: