PLS HELP ASAP I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT TO WRITE ILL GIVE 100 POINTS IF THE ANSWER ACTUALLY HELPS!!!... 1. Read and analyze primary and secondary sources to gather information about the Haymarket Affair, Homestead Strike, and Pullman Strike. Use the sources to determine the causes and effects of the three events.

3.Create a three-column chart showing the causes and effects.

2. Take the role of a participant in one of the three events. Write a letter explaining why you participated. Use information from your causal analysis of the sources to write your letter. Consider such factors as the conditions faced by workers and the responses of factory owners and the government to union actions.

umm. Explanation:

In order to be able to solve this problem, you will need to know the value of water's specific heat, which is listed as

c

=

4.18

J

g

∘

C

Now, let's assume that you don't know the equation that allows you to plug in your values and find how much heat would be needed to heat that much water by that many degrees Celsius.

Take a look at the specific heat of water. As you know, a substance's specific heat tells you how much heat is needed in order to increase the temperature of

1 g

of that substance by

1

∘

C

.

In water's case, you need to provide

4.18 J

of heat per gram of water to increase its temperature by

1

∘

C

.

What if you wanted to increase the temperature of

1 g

of water by

2

∘

C

? You'd need to provide it with

increase by 1

∘

C



4.18 J

+

increase by 1

∘

C



4.18 J

=

increase by 2

∘

C



2

×

4.18 J

To increase the temperature of

1 g

of water by

n

∘

C

, you'd need to supply it with

increase by 1

∘

C



4.18 J

+

increase by 1

∘

C



4.18 J

+

...

=

increase by n

∘

C



n

×

4.18 J

Now let's say that you wanted to cause a

1

∘

C

increase in a

2-g

sample of water. You'd need to provide it with

for 1 g of water



4.18 J

+

for 1 g of water



4.18 J

=

for 2 g of water



2

×

4.18 J

To cause a

1

∘

C

increase in the temperature of

m

grams of water, you'd need to supply it with

for 1 g of water



4.18 J

+

for 1 g of water



4.18 J

+

,,,

=

for m g of water



m

×

4.18 J

This means that in order to increase the temperature of

m

grams of water by

n

∘

C

, you need to provide it with

heat

=

m

×

n

×

specific heat

This will account for increasing the temperature of the first gram of the sample by

n

∘

C

, of the the second gram by

n

∘

C

, of the third gram by

n

∘

C

, and so on until you reach

m

grams of water.

And there you have it. The equation that describes all this will thus be

q

=

m

⋅

c

⋅

Δ

T

, where

q

- heat absorbed

m

- the mass of the sample

c

- the specific heat of the substance

Δ

T

- the change in temperature, defined as final temperature minus initial temperature

In your case, you will have

q

=

100.0

g

⋅

4.18

J

g

∘

C

⋅

(

50.0

−

25.0

)

∘

C

q

=

10,450 J

Rounded to three sig figs and expressed in kilojoules, t

Explanation:

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.

i don't see how you want other people to do your work for you and it is like you are just handing your assignment to anybody else and having them deal with it instead of your self i thought this site was for asking questions and somebody could you on it not just handing your work to somebody else to deal with it just saying don't mean to be mean just proving a fact.

explanation: