History, 30.10.2020 16:20, niniaalvarez

How did the Han's imperial Mandate of Heaven differ from Roman emperors' claims that they were the sons of gods? Choose 1 Choose 1 (Choice A) A Roman emperors used their divine title to justify their rule while the Mandate of Heaven only gave religious leadership to the emperor. (Choice B) B Even though both were used to legitimize their rule, only Chinese emperors could rely solely on the Mandate to keep them in power. (Choice C) C The Mandate of Heaven justified the emperor's dynastic rule while Roman emperors' claims to a divine connection simply placed them at the head of Roman religion. (Choice D, Checked) D While both justified their respective rules, the Mandate of Heaven was seen as conditional while the Roman's claims were not.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 12:30, ambercable3

Thomas paine suggested in common sense that britain could not rule the american colonies well because a. their religions were very different. b. america was too large and too far away. c. the british navy could not protect the colonies. d. the colonies had too few resources.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 19:00, antasiaturner7

The word “expires” tells the reader that paine believed the colonies’ separation from britain was inevitable. concerning. dangerous. fixable.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 21:10, dapabaro

In japan, the had nearly total power, but he was also assisted by

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 23:20, Blaise2653

From the soviet point of view, which reagan policy most threatened to create a new arms race? a. strategic defense initiative b. u. s. support for israel c. aid to the anti-soviet rebels in afghanistan d. iran-contra scandal

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

How did the Han's imperial Mandate of Heaven differ from Roman emperors' claims that they were the s...