Which of the following statements would most likely be made by a person that did not support expansionism? A. "The military of the U. S. is not strong enough to control lands in Africa and India"

B. "The more land the U. S. acquired, the harder it is for the government to maintain control."

C. "The customs and culture of America will slowly disappear as we assimilate the food and religions of other lands"

D. "Acquiring more land will cost us money we need to support the development of new weapons.

B. "The more land the U.S. acquired, the harder it is for the government to maintain control."

Explanation:

Expansion in nationalist is a answer to world problems because we can give our government systems to them so they can have peace like we do. But people whose opinions would say that by taking in another country would fall short of requirements because we are to focused on the world beyond our borders. so by taking in other countries when we can't even control our own is kind of an oxymoron.

However there have been times when Expansion has benefited America for instance after the battle of the Spanish-American war we gained a better trade route with china and Africa.

So in some points yes Expansion is important and can benefit your country however you also have to look within your own borders to see whether expanding will help the people within your country or harm them.

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.

i believe that the correct answer is a canadian hero.

explanation: he is celebrated as a national hero in canada for successfully thwarting a united states takeover of canada during the war of 1812.