Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954) illustrate how the same Constitutional issue of was interpreted differently over time. A. Slavery B. State sovereignty C. Separate but equal D. Separation of church and state

C ; separate but equal

Explanation:

The correct answer to this question is the option C.

The question seeks to understand how both cases were interpreted with respect to constitutional provisions.

From the question we can see that these two cases happened at different times in history.

But due to the similarities and the fact that they are interpreted using the same constitutional provisions, then how this issue were adjudged was based on the fact they are equal but are adjudged at different times

president thomas jefferson hoped that the embargo act of 1807 would the united states by demonstrating to britain and france their dependence on american goods, convincing them to respect american neutrality and stop impressing american seamen. instead, the act had a devastating effect on american trade.