What were the dissenting opinions (the judges against the majority) in Shaw v. Reno?

The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Explanation:based on race and protection read what I typed for answer for more information