How does Ward’s description of the Roman government in Doc C compare to Polybius’ description in Doc A and Millar’s description in Doc B? Make it a short answer please.

Polubius' description is very naive and lacks proper research. It is purely academic and based on a study of the laws and procedures of government, elections and law-making. Millar’s description is more balanced as it adds to the description presented by Polubius but does provide the caveat that such description is only true in form and not in substance. Ward’s description on the other hand is thoroughly researched as he focuses not only on how the Roman Republic was formally organized but how it actually functioned on the ground with regards to civil participation in the selection of candidates and voting rights.

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

theodore had a quicked tempered personality while president taft was shy and barely noticable.theodore had started a dealing service with big companies which president taft completed.both were into making sure workers were always safe.president taft took the presidency more serious than theodore did.both loved to save nature.

hope this : )