Compare and contrast anaconda plan vs south’s plan

Answer with explanation:

Anaconda plan, a military strategy proposed by Union General Winfield Scott early in the American Civil War. The plan called for a naval blockade of the Confederate littoral, a thrust down the Mississippi, and the strangulation of the South by Union land and naval forces.

South's Plan was simple and straightforward. Since the South had the advantage of a large open territory, all the South had to do was defend their land and put to use their impressive military leadership until Union Soldiers grew tired of fighting. The South also attempted to get support from European countries, especially Britain. The South hoped that cotton that Britain needed for its textile mills would influence them to aid the Confederacy.

Hope this helped! (brainliest please)

the answer is the ku klux klan

after the civil war, and with the termination of slavery, the south was faced with a big problem; what was supposed to happen and how they were supposed to deal with the freedom and the rights that black people and freed slaves had gained as a result of the north defeating the south and forcing the end of slavery. first, most, if not all, of the workforce of the south came from slaves and they did not have an option to replace the loss of said workforce. second, particularly in the south, people were convinced that black people were lesser, less intelligent, less capable and less smart than whites. this posed a huge problem for them. also, southerners were faced with another issue; freed slaves now had a say in how their lives would be lived and the right to politically choose the way they would be governed. people in the south did not want to accept this, none of this and this opposition and the conflicts that arose from it, not to mention the afereffects of the war, forced the congress of the time to enact and enforce the reconstruction plans that had been proposed by president andrew johnson.