In the period from 1450 to 1750, rules of empires developed new methods of governing to solidify their authority overtheir subjects Develop an argument that compares the extent to which rulers of land-based empires used political, social, or cultural factors to legitimize and consolidate their power differently in the period 1450 to 1750 whatsthe answer

ask google there you might be able to find an answer for the question you're trying to ask

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

answer; i believe that the correct answer is (c) arctic tundra;

they made rome the dominant power in the mediterranean.