History, 14.10.2019 11:00, gwbdee918

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?

a) they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived?
b) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.
c) they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool.
d) they can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 19:00, tagerryawilson6

Who was a leader of the soviet union. a) winston churchill b) fidel castro c) harry truman d) mikhail gorbachev

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 21:30, lukasconway7644

During the cold war, which of the following groups of countries would have all been"behind the iron curtain"

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 02:20, tansebas1107

Did the west show signs of cultural decline in the 20th century?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 03:00, lindselu

President of the united states has scheduled a cabinet meeting today to discuss energy policy with specific focus on pollution and global warming. given what you know of the executive branch, which group of attendees would the president most likely expect to provide up-to-date information and expert insight during this meeting?

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for h...