Why did the Seminole argue that their treaty, the Treaty of Fort Gibson, was illegitimate and unenforceable? A. The treaty gave the tribe the choice to go or stay on their lands.
B. The treaty was signed by a small group that did not represent the tribe.
C. The treaty offered to keep the tribe in Florida.
D. The treaty did not offer payment for their lands.

B. The treaty was signed by a small group that did not represent the tribe.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Fort Gibson basically enable US government to take over the Seminole's Territory. In exchange, the government promise to provide assistance on Seminole's reallocation process.

This treaty has more downsides than benefits for the Seminole people.

At that time, the treaty was signed only by 3 Representatives of the Seminole tribe. They did it without obtaining the consent of the majority members of the tribes that have to experience the negative impact of the treaty. This is why they argued that the treaty was illegitimate and unenforceable.

im not sure its either a leader of a group of congresspeople or a person from a congressmans district

sorry im not sure

where's the