In the period 600 to 1450 C. E., trade networks expanded and economic productive capacity increased. Technological innovations and transfers often contributed to this process. Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which technological innovations or transfers led to increased economic growth in this period

An argument which evaluates the extent to which technological innovations or transfers led to increased economic growth in this period of 600 to 1450 C.E is:

According to the given question, we are asked to develop an argument which shows how technological innovations helped to advance economic growth during the period of 600-1450 C.E

As a result of this, we can see that there are technological innovations which brought about new ways to navigate the seas and also led to the discovery of the Silk Road which enhanced trade and boosted the economy.

Read more here:

link

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

During that time, classical empires fall, allowing the decentralization of many governments in Europe and China. The western Roman Empire collapsed, and the Byzantine Empire maintained Constantinople as an important trade hub, where people from afar regions gathered to exchange their goods.

So during the period of 600 to 1450 C.E., trade networks increased and included far away places such as the Arab Caliphates. Important trade routes such as the Silk Road, the Trans-Sahara trade, and the Indian Ocean trade maintained constant trade of precious metals such as gold and silver, fine silks from China, ivory from Africa, but also served to the spread of diseases such as the Bubonic plague.

a.   it resulted in widespread unemployment.

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.