History
History, 14.10.2020 14:01, footboy773

1 In 757 there were several hundred Buddhist priests employed in the palace to conduct religious services; in 765 the Emperor, taking with him two cartloads of the Buddhist Scriptures, proceeded to deposit them in a monastery and to expound their contents. In 768 the Emperor visited a large Buddhist temple which had been built for the repose of his deceased mother, and appointed one thousand priests and nuns, also defraying the expense of annual [liturgies] for her soul. In 810 things came to such a pitch that the Emperor received into the palace with great honour a bone of Buddha, which had been originally brought from India and placed in a monastery, where it was exhibited to the populace once in thirty years, and was supposed to have a beneficial influence upon the crops.

2 The relic was kept for three days in the palace, and then passed round to various Buddhist monasteries, where it was on exhibition. This outrage upon conventions was too much for the Confucianists of the day, as represented by Han Wen-kung [also called Han Yu], one of the greatest in the long roll-call of China’s great men. He had already been degraded sixteen years before, for an offensive memorial on the subject of tax-collection; but now, at the age of fifty-one and full of honours, he rose again to the occasion, and presented another more offensive still.

3 He begins by pointing out that Buddhism is a religion of barbarians, of late introduction into China, and quite unknown to the ancients. He shows that the monarchs of old enjoyed long lives without Buddhism, and that not only the Emperors but also the dynasties of Buddhistic tendencies had always been short-lived; and he further enlarges upon the bad example which will be set by the Emperor to an ignorant people.

4 The memorial ends thus: “Buddha was a barbarian. His language was not the language of China. His clothes were of an alien cut. He did not teach the maxims of our ancient rulers, nor conform to the customs which they had handed down. He did not appreciate the bond between prince and subject, the tie between father and son. Supposing, indeed, that this Buddha had come to our capital in the flesh, under an appointment from his own State, then your Majesty might have received him with a few words of admonition, bestowing on him a banquet and a suit of clothes, previous to sending him out of the country with an escort of soldiers, and thereby have avoided any dangerous influence on the minds of the people. But what are the facts? The bone of a man long since dead and decomposed, is admitted, forsooth, within the precincts of the Imperial palace! Did not Confucius say, ‘Revere spiritual beings, while maintaining always a due reserve’?

5 When the princes of old paid visits of condolence to one another, it was customary for them to send on a magician in advance, with a peach-wand in his hand, whereby to expel all noxious bewitchments previous to the arrival of his master. Yet now your Majesty is about to introduce, without cause, a disgusting object, personally taking part in the proceedings without the intervention either of the magician or of his peach-wand. Of the officials, not one has raised his voice against it; of the censors, not one has pointed out the enormity of such an act. Therefore your servant, overwhelmed with shame at such slackness, now implores your Majesty that the bone may be handed over for destruction by fire or water, whereby the root of this great evil may be exterminated for all time, and the people know how much the wisdom of your Majesty surpasses that of ordinary men. The glory of such a deed will be beyond all praise. And should the Lord Buddha have power to avenge this insult by the infliction of some misfortune, then let the vials of his wrath be poured out upon the person of your servant, who now calls God to witness that he will not repent him of his oath. In all gratitude and sincerity, and with fear and trembling, your servant now humbly presents this memorial for your Majesty’s benign consideration.”

According to the excerpt, what did the emperor do that caused an outrage among the Confucianists?

He exhibited a bone of the Buddha that originated in India.

He promoted Buddhist scripture.

He honored his mother in a Buddhist temple.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 05:20, via21
Which of the following best describes president harding's goals
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:20, raymondanthony3314
What type of monarch was fredrick the great ?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, punchbug007
For most of the twentieth century, percentage of men had a college degree compared to women. however, if we focus on the data for americans born in or later, a higher percentage of women hold college degrees.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:30, ajbyrd911
Question 1 of 10 2 points which phrase best describes an event's "historical context? " o a. the social or political setting in which it occurred b. the total number of people it affected o c. the unfair interpretations people have made about it o d. the different views people hold about it
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
1 In 757 there were several hundred Buddhist priests employed in the palace to conduct religious ser...

Questions in other subjects: