History
History, 12.10.2020 19:01, mcalepcrager

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? A separate bill of rights might be used later to weaken America’s reputation.
A separate bill of rights be might used later to free enslaved people.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution was not taking away any rights from citizens.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:30, meme2186
Why was the emancipation proclamation widely attacked when it was written?
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 21:40, ethans5
Why are primary sources important when studying historical events
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, sarai47
The current laws today protect the rights of people with disabilities.    a.  trueb.  false
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:30, batman48000
Use the passage to answer the question. blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. blessed are the pure of heart, for they shall see god. blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of god. —jesus christ which message was jesus trying to convey with these words? a. patience and understanding of righteous people b. food and water for those who are hungry and thirsty c. blessings and support for those who inherit the most d. mercy and sympathy for the poor and
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? A...

Questions in other subjects: