How does the legal precedent set by the decision in the Brown case relate to the concept of federalism? The precedent ended discrimination in the United States.
The precedent ensured that federal agencies observed the Ninth Amendment right to equality.
The precedent overturned state laws based on an interpretation of the Constitution.
The precedent amended the Constitution.

The case acted as legal precedent to concept of federalism because the state laws was overturned based on an interpretation of the Constitution.

In the case of Brown V Board, the defendant lawyer argued that segregation by law implied that African Americans were inferior to whites and asked to court to strike down segregation under the law.

The Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

So, the case displayed the superiority given to the Constitution over the state laws.

Therefore, in conclusion, the Option C is correct since the case acted as legal precedent to concept of federalism because the state laws was overturned based on an interpretation of the Constitution.

Read more about this here

link

The precedent overturned state laws based on an interprition of the constitution yw

Explanation:

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!