PLS HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 25 POINTS How might judicial situations be different if the constitution did not guide change over them?

Since the Bill of Rights—the first ten amendments to the Constitution—was adopted in 1791, Congress has passed an additional twenty-three amendments, of which the states have ratified only seventeen. ... Instead of the state legislatures, amendments can be ratified by conventions in three-quarters of the states

While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been ... people, as expressed in their Constitution, would be supreme over the will of a ... terms leaving it open to future elaboration to meet changing conditions.

Explanation:

depends on the age of the teen, many believe by the age of 16 a person should know the strong difference between right and wrong along with the difference between risky and immediate death. swimming with sharks might be dangerous but swimming with sharks while bloody meat is attached to you is just insane. even more if you have no idea what you're doing. however, no matter the age, as long as the person is skilled enough and has the mental and physical capacity to control their actions doing whatever sport they put their mind to is all that matters.

social act if im thinking of the right thing

explanation:

know it