Which best describes how the outcome of Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) helped define the role of the federal government? The Supreme Court decided that only federal laws, not state laws, could be considered by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided that the federal government had key powers over state governments. The Supreme Court decided that state laws were superior to those of the federal government. The Supreme Court decided that the federal government should be structured in a specific way.

The Supreme Court decided that the federal government had key powers over state governments.

Explanation:

Gibbons v. Ogden was the case filed in the Supreme Court in 1824. The case was about supremacy power to operate commerce was given to whom, state government or federal government.

Gibbons and Ogden, both were steamboat operators. Gibbons got his license to navigate on interstate waterways, approved from the federal government whereas, Ogden got his license approved from the state government to navigate on the state's waterways.

Ogden filed the complaint against Gibbins, in the Court of Chancery, New York, stating that the state should limit Gibbins interstate waterways navigation.

When the case went to Supreme Court, the court gave verdict in favor of Gibbins stating that as per the Commerce Clause, Article 1, Section 8, the power to operate commerce is given to federal government and thus eliminating any power to state government for the same.

Thus the correct answer is the second option, that Supreme Court of US decided that federal government had key powers over state government.

yes, there are senators in each state

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.