How could there be different explanation for the same event in history?

By studying the details and the different opinions of each of the historians

Two people might witness the event but not necessarily have the same point of view. Some people might be experts in a certain area, like warfare or being a ship's captain, and therefore might be more qualified to say what actually happened than someone without that expertise. Both people could be telling the truth as they saw and heard it, but the actual events might be different. In addition, some people might be biased, and their personal opinions of an event could influence their account.

Explanation:

even if someone does vote because of your twitter status, there is no civic duty and would have been a more responsible citizen by not voting at all. voting should therefore not be viewed as a fulfillment of civic duty.

hope this : )

discovery of cape town-portuguese empire

development of africans language-dutch east india company

introduction of railway-british empire