History, 03.09.2020 03:01, SkyeShadow525
Which statement best explains why this source is credible or not? A. This is a credible source because it presents facts and evidence about the discovery of Ă–tzi. B. This is a credible source because it contains an interview with Ă–tzi that tells about his life. C. This is not a credible source because it contains information that is not relevant to Ă–tzi. D. This is not a credible source because it is biased because it contains sarcasm about Ă–tzi.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 22.06.2019 00:10, Gattuso
Based on a comparison of the myths “the maori: genealogies and origins in new zealand” and “the raven and the first men: the beginnings of the haida,” if the maori and the haida people decided to create a myth together, what would most likely be the value expressed?
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, genyjoannerubiera
45 were the 1920s a “return to normalcy” or a “time of great change”? submit it in a letter format.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 06:20, ggpro4life3000
Which of the following could be seen as a weakness of a two-party system? a. the two-party system limits voters' options in electing officials. b. the two-party system limits debate on issues. c. the two-party system limits the range of solutions that will be considered. d. all of these are weaknesses
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Which statement best explains why this source is credible or not? A. This is a credible source becau...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 03:50
