In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to
mean that:
A. s...
In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to
mean that:
A. states had to redistrict to ensure that all votes counted equally.
B. states could redistrict to ensure that rural votes counted more than urban votes
C. states were not obligated to redistrict to ensure all votes counted equally.
D. states could determine when and how often they would redistrict
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 18:00, liyahheadhigh
I’m annoyed but glad that my history teacher left and quit her job as a teacher to become a flight attendant
Answers: 1
English, 27.11.2020 04:00
Computers and Technology, 27.11.2020 04:00
Mathematics, 27.11.2020 04:00