Does the growing number of interest groups support Byrd’s conclusion? Give your answer in the form of a brief paragraph

Yes, a rising number of interested groups in the United States agree with Senator Byrd's conclusion.

Senator Byrd was concerned about the growing number of these groups and their lack of supervision. Keep in mind that these interest organizations engage lobbyists to help them deal with politicians.

However, US Congressmen must be conscious that voters voted for them and elected them to serve as their congressional representatives. As a result, they serve the public rather than special interest groups' goals.

Learn more:

link

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Yes, the growing number of interest groups support US Senator Byrd’s conclusion.

There is too much money involved in interest groups, and an increasing number of these groups have been appearing in the United States political scene. Senator Byrd was worried about this increased number and lack of control over these groups. Let's have in mind that these interest groups hire lobbyists to negotiate with legislators and offer support. But the US Congressmen had to be aware that it is the citizens that voted for them and put them in Congress as their representatives. So they serve the people, not the particular agendas of interest groups.

option a

explanation:

to cleberate the end of their war

part a. there were 250 teenagers surveyed (100% of tenagers = 250)therefore 1 % = 250/100 = 2.5 76% = 1% x 76 = 2.5 x 76 = 190 teenagers of the 250 surveyed liked burgerspart b: jane surveyed 25% (which is equal to 50 teenagers, i.e. a quarter of the teenagers surveyed is 50) to get 100% we simply get 4 quarters, i.e. multiply 50 by 4 = 200 teenagers were surveyed by jane. part c: it is impossible to give an example where a percentage is greater than 100%, since, by definition , percentage means "per 100".