Is it preferable for the U. S. government to have unified party control or divided government? Why?

Explanation:

It is preferable for the U.S. government to have a unified party control in order to avoid conflict. There should be diversity in the way individual members think, yes, but a divided government has a higher probability of causing big group disputes and those never lead anywhere good. With one unified party, members will have similar beliefs and goals for the country, which will allow for a better, more efficient government and running of the country.

answer: are there any

explanation:

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.