Resistance to the Vietnam War grew in the late 1960s. What explanation does the graph support for that growing resistance? -The United States did not send soldiers to Vietnam until the late 1960s. -The United States became more deeply involved in Vietnam in the late 1960s. -The United States’ involvement in Vietnam had not changed in the late 1960s.

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.  

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.

which

like dude you only explained

the problem not the

workers should be given a fair share of the wealth their work creates

hope this