History
History, 17.07.2020 20:01, Benysod402

A government passes a law increasing taxes on banks. Two days later, there are several bank robberies. A politician who opposed the taxes claims that
the new law is causing bank robberies. Why is the politician's argument not
very convincing?
A. It fails to prove correlation.
B. It claims that the law has no good cause.
C. It establishes a historical narrative.
D. It confuses correlation with causation,

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:30, davidaagurto
How are the freedom of religion and the freedom of assembly alike? both involve the freedom to express oneself. both were an original part of the constitution. both were practiced by the early puritans. both were denied to immigrants.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, jerry546
The final solution was nazi germany’s plan to
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:30, mastershadow2018
How did the supreme court decision in the slaughterhouse cause an affect american business
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:50, dontcareanyonemo
What was the compromise that allowed california to be admitted to the union l-ala on?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
A government passes a law increasing taxes on banks. Two days later, there are several bank robberi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 20.02.2021 01:50