The founders placed a great amount of emphasis on individual states as the centerpiece of the new system. Did they place too much emphasis on the states? Or not enough? Does it still make sense to emphasize the state as the main unit of representation, or does something else make more sense today?

I think the founding fathers placed the needed attention

Explanation:

I believe they put enough attention to the state as the primary political system. See, the concept of state is based on the idea of individual freedom, and in this case, the state acts as a moderator of the issues. Without it, there will be anarchy.  However, once the state begins to accumulate power, that's the moment the citizens have to fight against it. That's why I believe the founding fathers thought carefully about what kind of state they wanted for the new nation. A limited one, and still useful. And yes, the state still is worth, because is a trustful political organization, easy to understand and to maintain.

latin america is a region of racial and cultural diversity.  it is a group of countries and dependencies in the americas where romance languages are predominant. the term originated in 19th century france as amérique latine to consider french-speaking territories in the americas along with the larger group of countries where spanish and portuguese languages prevailed.

explanation:

john f. kennedy purpose was to make his argument a strong appeal to emotion in order to make an impact and connection to american citizens. he want to achieve peace by telling the citizens they shouldn't be afraid of other nations.

explanation: