Given what you now know about Vietnam, how do you think other countries might feel about our approach to foreign relations? Does this differ from or mirror opinions you’ve heard from your friends or at home?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What mostly all other countries feel about our approach to foreign relations is that the United States is an interventionist country that invests millions of dollars in warfare, instead of investing that money in programs that help their citizens. Social programs in health services, homes, and better infrastructure for the poor and the minorities such as black people. Indeed, other countries know that the US government is in deep debt, partly for all the amount of money it invests in war and invasions.

This opinion does not differ from the opinions I've heard from my friends. In a connected society that allows us to communicate through the internet to other parts of the world, American people can be informed about what other countries think about our foreign policy.

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3