Consider the statement made by some historians that WWI was the continuation of WWI. Do you agree or disagree?Explain your position.

I agree with the historians that say that WWII was a continuation of WWI because the conditions the winners imposed on Germany led her to the nationalization movement, the margination of the minorities, and the call to make Germany great again.

Explanation:

The reasons that make WWII a continuation of WWI were that in the first place after WWI Germany suffered from the impositions the winners of the first war gave her. Making her responsible for the war crimes and the disaster created. Thus, she had to pay for all the damage and remain under the watch of the former allies. However, after a while when the world found peace Germany developed a movement to make her great again by strengthening its economy with economic deals that sought less deficit between the countries that engaged in trade with her. Also, by claiming that Jews and immigrants were responsible for the poverty of Germany and the lack of jobs they were. When was the bad management of the resources, and the payment of the damages Germany did in the previous war. Thus, a new party emerged, a right-wing conservative party that sought to give jobs to the working class, former farmers, and non-skilled workers. Then, they made a coup de etat and took control over democracy. To make it a socialist one-party democracy.

the answer is b for brother

a slave could own nothing, he can't have a wife, children, or a home. they cant possess nothing and acquire nothing. hope this