History, 27.05.2020 23:58, sammielucero

One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?

one historian did not examine primary sources

one of the historians' research has serious flaws

they used different secondary sources for research

their interpretations of historical facts vary

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 18:00, reycaden

What do the tuareg culture and the candomblé faith have in common? a. both originated in the south pacific. b. both appropriated cultural traditions from multiple sources. c. both developed close ties with the catholic church. d. both have a long history of religious persecution.

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 08:30, Jaedenaleinson

Which of the following did the maya, aztec, and inca all have in common

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 08:30, mmuehling929p34r7g

The reason new hampshire was founded

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 08:50, mallorynichole19

12which best describes how civil rights workers were treated during the freedom summer campaign? many workers were ignored. some workers were arrested or killed. some workers were treated well. o a few workers were warned to leave.-tshp---s1-mark this and returnsave and exitnextletvldoll

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...