One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 12:30, WTDjase
According to documents in wiesner et al., why has access to water been such an important factor in the rise of complex societies? how did ancient societies address the problems associated with harnessing these powerful resources? how have historians assessed and addressed this issue? cite the appropriate documents relevant to the response.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, brainzz04
Hey!me its for an important test! ! which issue during the progressive era would most likely have united mary harris "mother” jones and lewis hine? a) ending child labor b) regulating monopolies c) using photography to expose poor working conditions d) exposing the lack of jobs available for untrained laborers
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Questions in other subjects:
History, 15.10.2019 15:30
History, 15.10.2019 15:30
History, 15.10.2019 15:30
