What argument does the author anticipate and indirectly refute in this excerpt from the declaration of independence?

in every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. a prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

a. the colonists are suffering only because of their lack of representation in parliament.

b. if the colonists are suffering, they need to first submit a petition to parliament.

c. the colonists have no right to oppose the laws and taxes levied by the king of england.

d. parliament has no involvement in the matters of the american colonies.

The correct answer is:

If the colonists are suffering, they need to first submit a petition to Parliament.

The petition of the British Colonies in North America opposing the 1765 Stamp Act was an unusual move by Parliament. This action was the starting point of a chain of events that ended up leading to the American Declaration of Independence in July 1776 the following year.

gaius cassius longinus and marcus junius brutus, former enemies of julius caesar who'd joined the roman senate, led caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves "the liberators." and the second one is   the assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius longinus, decimus junius brutus albinus, and marcus junius brutus. they stabbed caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march 15 march 44 bc.

i beleive that d is the right answer