History, 22.05.2020 03:12, dsean1273

Which best describes the effect of the narration in the excerpt?

It indicates that Farquhar is easily distracted and no longer concerned with his family.

It highlights Farquhar’s confusion about whether or not he is alive and experiencing reality.

It emphasizes Farquhar’s euphoric feelings about the rope breaking and his apparent survival.

It proves that Farquhar is experiencing a dream before that fact is revealed to the reader.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

answered: flaco0811

It emphasizes Farquhar’s euphoric feelings about the rope breaking and his apparent survival.

Explanation:

From the text it can be seen that Farquhar is extremely happy that he survived the hanging. His energy was restored and he wept for joy. His actions then show just how euphoric he was as he threw the sand up and compared it's beauty to everything beautiful which was most probably because he never thought that he would feel the ground again while alive.

answered: Guest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answered: Guest

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another. the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial. persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota: minnesota house research, separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 13:30, kingfptduong

The soviet union communist government was different from bad i germany's fascist goverment

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 17:30, eguilford4438

Even before world war ii had ended, it was apparent that the allies would not remain friends in the post-war era. explain what is meant by the term cold war. then describe how the conflict between the superpowers manifested itself in the two following regions: europe and asia.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 19:00, cancerbaby209

What initiatives were taken by americans to benefit the war effort? 1. americans planted home gardens to ration food for the troops. 2.american charities were established to provide aid to factory workers. 3.american companies joined together to make products more cheaply. 4.americans created clubs for promoting weapons to be used in the war.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 20:00, MichaelG07

Background information: this is an article by will irvin, a correspondent for the new york tribune. irvin wrote this piece in april 1915, while reporting from the western front. at the time that irvin wrote this piece, the united states had declared neutrality in the war. boulogne, april 25. – the gaseous vapor which the germans used against the french divisions near ypres last thursday, contrary to the rules of the hague convention, introduces a new element into warfare. the attack of last thursday evening was preceded by the rising of a cloud of vapor, greenish gray and iridescent. that vapor settled to the ground like a swamp mist and drifted toward the french trenches on a brisk wind. its effect on the french was a violent nausea and faintness, followed by an utter collapse. it is believed that the germans, who charged in behind the vapor, met no resistance at all, the french at their front being virtually paralyzed. the effect of the noxious trench gas seems to be slow in wearing away. the men come out of their nausea in a state of utter collapse. some of the rescued have already died from the after effects. how many of the men left unconscious in the trenches when the french broke died from the fumes it is impossible to say, since those trenches were at once occupied by the germans. –will irvin, 1915 what were the effects of the poison gas, according to the reporter? a.) the french were victorious over the germans. b.) soldiers suffered from nausea and began to pass out, while some even died. c.) there were few effects, and the battle continued. d.) the gas was yellow and caused the men’s skin to blister.

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which best describes the effect of the narration in the excerpt?

It indicates that Farqu...