History
History, 07.05.2020 02:08, emmahuber980

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.
Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.
People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.
Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:10, Cobetate
What is one major goal of us economic foreign policy
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:00, gyexisromero10
In which sentence is the italicized word used correctly? a) the sloth is a benefactor that primarily feeds on vegetation, insects, and small birds and reptiles. b) the flood victims were eternally grateful to their benefactors who provided them with food, shelter, and clothing. c) the spectators in the stadium all cheered when the benefactor announced the game would go into overtime. d) the benefactors visiting the laboratory were impressed by the complex equipment the scientists used.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, shelbycade230
This passage says that the government is necessary because . the passage states that checks and balances are needed to
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:50, Esan2435
How did the international community respond to south africa’s policies in the 1980s?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

Evidence obt...

Questions in other subjects: