When the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution is it sometimes, in effect, making new laws? Is such “activism” on the part of the Supreme Court part of its job?

Indeed, when the Supreme Court interprets the scope of a certain law, it often creates rights, obligations or legal clauses that are not specifically written in said laws. This type of source of law is called jurisprudence, and it creates rights in the same way as laws, being a totally legitimate means.

This judicial activism is part of the work of the Supreme Court and judges in general; if judges only applied laws without interpreting them or delimiting their scope in specific situations, many specific situations of citizens or groups would be overlooked, which would lead to injustices and situations in which the law would not fulfill its purpose, which is to guarantee a peaceful and harmonious life in society.

Explanation:

Judicial activism refers to a judge or court who is more willing to declare legal or governmental actions invalid. This concept is broader than the strict right to review, in which a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure complies with the Constitution.

In America, judicial activism relies on the groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling in Marbury v. Madison, when the Court appropriated the right to review laws and government decisions in general from going against the Constitution.

Republicans use the term in the United States to oppose political interference by the Supreme Court by broadly interpreting constitutional law. According to the Democrats, however, legal activism is necessary to protect minorities from an irrational and discriminatory majority morality.

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.