Base your answers to questions 2 and 3 on the quotation below and on your knowledge of social studies. "Kenyatta explained the flag. ‘Black is . . . for black people. Red shows . . . [that] the blood of an African is the same colour as the blood of a European, and green shows . . . [that] when we were given this country by God it was green, fertile, and good.’ What he . . . must mean . . . [is] that our lands could only be regained by the blood (red) of the African (black)." — Karari Njama As leader of the Mau Mau in the 1950s, Jomo Kenyatta promoted these ideas as a way to:.
(1) work for Kenya’s independence
(2) imitate the practices of Mohandas Gandhi
(3) develop closer ties with England
(4) attract foreign investment to his nation

louverture's prominent role in the haitian success over colonialism and slavery had earned him the admiration of friends and detractors alike.

explanation:

toussaint louverture began his military career as a leader of the 1791 slave rebellion in saint-domingue; he was by then a free man and a jacobin.

under god i have placed my chiest strentgh and the safe guard to my loyal subjects

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

i believe it is the second one.   if correct plz mark brainliest.