Reflect on your decision in the case of Hazelwood versus Kumeier T. M v. State of Florida using the following question.
1) did your opinion reflect the majority of minority opinion on each case?
2) Did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights of each case? 3) what factors most influenced your decision and interpretation in each case?
(25 points!!)

1. I tended to favor a loose interpretation for this case. Although students have the right to express their opinions, it is necessary for restrictions in order to avoid mayhem within the student body. I believe that the school was properly protecting its students’ rights and representing the interest of the majority. Yes, newspapers are a form of public expressions but it is a school environment and the faculty has every right to alter the paper as needed.

2. Summary of the Decision. The Supreme Court ruled against the students in a 5-3 decision. Justice White wrote the majority opinion, concluding that the First Amendment does not prevent school officials from exercising reasonable authority over the content of school-sponsored publications.

3. The factor that most influenced your decision and interpretations in this case was the First Amendment. I believe the First Amendment to be very important because a minor should have the right to assembly in public places without being cited because they were out past curfew.

Explanation:

the outcome of 1970 oil crisis in united states was that, they began to search ways on how to reduce oil.

in 1970 was a period when there were energy and oil crisis. those who were major centers for industrialization were forced to keep way from supplying of petroleum.

some of the result of this crisis was economic growth became stagnant because prices of oil surged.

due to the increased prices some countries like mexico and norway benefited.