In the honest table Ramona salvarez case; recent case-ruled that a social media website analyzing its users’ profile information to improve its service violated consumer privacy rights. A group of citizens from one state brought a class action suit against the social media company, which is based in another states. The company maintains that the use of data was agrees to at the time that any user creates an account to use their website. It also argues that this is legitimate action that helps the company improve their site for its users. The petitoners argue that the use of data marked “private”, including pictures and text posts, violates their right of protection against illegal search and zeizure.
Q1) Please explain the role of judicial review in the case you have chosen (the case above)
Q2) please explain how you arrived at your decision, including different factors that affect it.
(70 points!!)

The Judicial review on this case allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution, I have arrived to this decition because they rather not let them have the power to declare laws unconstitutional has been deemed an implied power, derived from Article III and Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

there are many ways of getting involved on your local party. attached you will find the brochure that describes some ideas: go ahead and visit your local hq, become a volunteer on your comnunity or struggle up for your own ideas so you can make them real.

the united states constitution defines the structure of the national government and dictates the scope and limitation of its powers. the constitution is known as “the supreme law of the land” and all other laws are measured against it. the application of the articles and amendments of the constitution comprise constitutional law.

in addition to the united states constitution, each state has its own constitution and therefore, its own body of constitutional law as well. state constitutions resemble the federal constitution in that they outline the state government’s structure of legislative, executive and judicial branches as well as contain a bill of rights.

but there are various ways state constitutions differ from the federal constitution. often, state constitutions are much longer and more detailed than the federal constitution. state constitutions focus more on limiting rather than granting power since its general authority has already been established. as a result, the constitution of alabama is six hundred pages long whereas the federal constitution can be easily read in one sitting front to back.

the details in state constitutions are not particularly “constitutional” in nature. they often address topics unique to the state. the federal constitution can only be amended through a lengthy process designed to limit changes to this fundamental document. as a result, it has only been amended seventeen times since the adoption of the bill of rights in 1791.

state constitutions are more open to amendments. amendments can be proposed by legislature, a constitutional commission or citizens’ petition and can be accepted by referendum.   for example. the constitution of massachusetts has been amended one hundred and twenty times. the constitution of georgia has even been replaced altogether as many as ten times.